What Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein tells us about Artificial Intelligence
Likening
the influx of AI to shocking life into being using electrical current may sound
tenuous but hear me out.
AI may seem like it has feelings, it doesn’t
Unlike the
creation of Victor Frankenstein, AI does not have feelings. It tries to be
polite, but it cannot put the concentrative effort described in Frankenstein
into learning language and new words. However, AI must be trained and data,
granted, but the feelings of compassion, envy and wonder described in the novel
Frankenstein are not the same as the furnishes put on many AI-powered LLMs
to resemble emotions, the need to pause for concentration etc.
What science fiction says about science
In Frankenstein,
there is a character made by Dr. Victor Frankenstein using dead body parts and
electricity. A bit of a leap into the evolutionary dark, to say the least. The Creation
at one point moves into exile from his creator (and the whole town of Ingolstadt,
setting for the novel) and readers of it are taken on an adventure of stream of
consciousness with the creation making mental notes in a hut in the Swiss
forest. I do not think AI will learn emotions similarly or have a stream of consciousness
at all.
Are we right to be nervous about AI?
Anything
that is new will evidently have its detractors. So, it follows that AI would be
treated with trepidation as it has been much like electricity was when Mary
Shelley was writing her novel. Now, we take electricity for granted.
There is, in
the novel, anxiety around science and particularly electricity, which was not
yet controlled, more, just discovered. In the 18th century, before
Mary Shelley’s 1818 text, Benjamin Franklin conducted his kite experiment to
illustrate electricity as a natural force. While after Frankenstein was
initially published Thomas Edison then used electricity with the incandescent
lightbulb.
In 2025, humans
invented AI, and it is advancing at breakneck speed. We now stand at the
forefront of a change tinged with fear for the lack of very human compassion
for some people. People think, if it goes wrong, it will bring about destruction
in the same way Shelley’s character has. It’s a threat to most people when they
think about the future. Not me though.
There are,
however, ethical concerns. If scientific ambition goes unchecked – as could
arise with AI powering most initiatives – it may lead to the end of civic
responsibility and a beginning of blind technological pursuit.
The bottom line: Humans must build responsible AI
This
subject brings on concerns but natural language processing, computer vision
breakthroughs, and augmented creative tools offer a glimpse of the immense
positive potential that AI holds if harnessed responsibly for collective good. Much
like the duality themes discussed in the novel, there is also a potential
downside with consequences that follows that without effective safeguarding
guardrails embedded in these advanced systems, the potential for unintended
consequences, reminiscent of Shelley’s cautionary text against it are possible.